Both of your images are interesting. It is like looking through the wholes. If the background objects can have a little bit farther, I think it can create a lot of blur. I can not tell where is the focal point, and a strong visual path. If you could get an interesting angle, I think that would be more interesting.
For the last image. I can see that the brown iron thing is the focal point. The tree shadows are on showing on the wall, and floor which makes the image more interesting. Most of the lines are parallel. If you can change the angle or shooting, I think you can get more interesting images. Over all, they are looks good, and fit for the rules, but it just need more interesting elements. (Just an idea from me, I know different people have different tastes.)
Psychological ISO 800, ƒ/18, SS 2.5s Environmental ISO 400, ƒ/4, SS 1/15s Interpretive ISO 800, ƒ/4.8, SS 1/3s
Both of your images are interesting. It is like looking through the wholes. If the background objects can have a little bit farther, I think it can create a lot of blur. I can not tell where is the focal point, and a strong visual path. If you could get an interesting angle, I think that would be more interesting.
ReplyDeleteFor the last image. I can see that the brown iron thing is the focal point. The tree shadows are on showing on the wall, and floor which makes the image more interesting. Most of the lines are parallel. If you can change the angle or shooting, I think you can get more interesting images.
Over all, they are looks good, and fit for the rules, but it just need more interesting elements. (Just an idea from me, I know different people have different tastes.)